Jump to content

DoVlaLegend

Members
  • Content Count

    47
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

DoVlaLegend last won the day on April 25 2021

DoVlaLegend had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

21 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Will it be possible to set these kind of parameters in single player too (king aging, starting gold,ect) ?
  2. You wanted some examples of elephants in medieval Europe and I have provided them. Were there any grand battles with hundreds of war elephants? No, but they had other use as stated before. The argument here is "what's a fun game mechanic that's historically inspired" and war elephants would 100% fall in that category. If we are being nitpicky than having an option to have different resources at every start would factually be 1000% false, but it helps to make a game more enjoyable and repayable. So in that case I believe that even with the war elephants not being used in Europe like
  3. "In the Middle Ages, elephants were seldom used in Europe. Charlemagne took his one elephant, Abul-Abbas, when he went to fight the Danes in 804, and the Crusades gave Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II the opportunity to capture an elephant in the Holy Land, the same animal later being used in the capture of Cremona in 1214, but the use of these individual animals was more symbolic than practical, especially when contrasting food and water consumption of elephants in foreign lands and the harsh conditions of the crusades." Like I said, there were not used as much as in Asia and Africa, but
  4. False, they were used but usually as moral boost or to strike fear into the enemy, because they are not native to Europe and because they could not feed them much during the invasion of foreing lands. But in a game like this you sometimes need to take into the consideration fun game mechanic vs. historical fact. And let be honest, war elephants would fun as heck 🙂 mby limit them to 1-2 per army and make the army that use them kinda slow and they should consume a lot of food to balance them in a game..
  5. They were used in North Africa as well. Even in Roman times.
  6. I have sevral questions: 1) Like many have already asked, how can we prevent our royal court being bribed? Will we need one of our spies to stay at home court like in KoH in order to counter enemies spies or will there be some other way of defending them? 2) Will it be still possible for you to become a king of other kingdom like in KoH ( place a spy as General and then kill off every heir)? 3) In order to find out where captured enemy spy comes from, do we need to tortue him? If yes, do we lose our crown power? ... Or can we extract that information some pther way
  7. Yes they did. But I hope they add it in later updates or maybe as an DLC (for a reasnoble price).
  8. Like I said, there is no drawback in using only DEF tactic (at least the way you presented). And again, as a casual player I don't want to spend 10-15min on a single battle because of the ATK/DEF tactic. And setting default orders and then not changing them does not make sense, since every battle is diffrent agains diffrent units and Marshals with different perks/skills, so I my opinion letting algorithm do it job is the best choice (you will have your hands full with choosing the right units to make the best synergy as it is). Well now you are just going into the extreme and don
  9. I mean lot's of you guys are arguing about the stuff we don't have enough information of yet. I do agree on some things like: - armies having time to train (Marshal in trainig for 1 min, basic spear man 5-10 sec, heavy cavilary 40 sec... for example) - reinforcement should stay (it is both historicaly correct and fun to have your 2nd army come in last second and give you another chance to win) - 2 Marshals is a good choice (again, historicaly there usually weren't more than 2 Marshals/Generals at the same place at the same time, since more than 2 of them would be logistica
  10. Agree. I mean we don't even know how the game will be played, yet they want "hardcore". I mean there is nothing wrong with that, everyone has they one playstyle. I am just worried that later people will complain "the game is unplayable, AI is to smart/cheating, etc..". Like stated by Yavor before, make it as you intended it. 🙂
  11. I love that you listened to the community and add such feature to the Princessess, which I believe will be married off more often than before. Great job 🤩. Can we expect any other featured by Queens or Princesses? (Like suggestions on this thread Any additional thought being put into Princesses?) Would love to know if you got inspired by the community or was there always a plan to do something with Princessess? if you can answer this question on the stream 🙂
  12. I agree with you. Making them dismountable makes them OP, since nobody would take basic footman, because with cavalry they have 2 units in 1.
  13. 1. I am not really a fan of scaling since I liked "All or nothing" approach in KoH with Kingdom Advantages, since it's more strategic. You need to make some compromises like "Do I want to start a war to get that one province I need or do I keep peace and get nothing" ... That's just my opinion tho 😅 2. That's acctually a great thought and I like it 😃 3. Yeah I totally forgot about negative side. That should totally be included since bigger and stronger kingdoms don't need that much bonuses or it will break a game. Yeah I don't thing that could work, since the whole idea to ke
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.